owlpornsites
Categories
EN

Babepedia: review of the community encyclopedia of models and porn stars

babepedia.com

Review checked on

  • Tool
  • Free
  • Community
Visit

Photo galleries sit alongside social accounts and aliases on Babepedia's 177,102 model, actress and influencer profiles. You can follow a name into nude photos or browse a niche ranking for someone new. An advertised 287,866 photos make it particularly useful for discovering faces.

Babepedia

babepedia.com

At a glance
TypeCommunity encyclopedia of models, run on open encyclopedia principles
Library177,102 profiles, 18,359 galleries and 287,866 photos, timestamped statistics page
Professions29,955 adult models, 24,077 porn stars, 21,317 actresses, 13,548 influencers
Field coverageInstagram on 55.2% of profiles, a written biography on 31.9%, IAFD on 6.0%
Community7,965,757 votes and 319,747 comments, edits published at once and reviewed afterwards
Ranking17,828 porn stars across 179 pages, MILF, Asian, Latina, Slavic, ebony, Caucasian and OnlyFans versions
AdmissionA clear public presence, public modelling photos, 5,000 social media followers and reliable information, no prior consent, suggestions reviewed within seven days
ImagesRetouched, AI-generated, cover and hardcore photos refused, four galleries a day
RemediesProfile lock, photo changes and deletion on proof of identity, deletion handled within one to seven days
PriceFree, advertising funded, paid promotion offered to models
Partner linksA Friends bar including AI undressing tools

An encyclopedia of models with photos

Screenshot of babepedia.com
Babepedia

Babepedia is an encyclopedia built by its members, who contribute photos, profile details, links and comments. You will find mainstream actresses, glamour models and influencers alongside porn performers.

How much a profile contains

The statistics page breaks down coverage for individual fields. It helps you judge whether a search is more likely to turn up social accounts or a written profile.

How complete Babepedia profiles are, from its statistics page
Profile fieldProfiles with itShare
Instagram97,82655.2%
Written biography56,53631.9%
X44,07324.9%
IMDb26,82115.1%
OnlyFans20,36411.5%
IAFD10,5706.0%

A clear public presence, publicly available modelling photos, at least 5,000 followers on a social network and reliable information make someone eligible without prior permission. A personal page alone is insufficient.

Suggesting, editing and voting

Reading is open to everyone. A free account lets you submit edits, add photos, vote and keep favourites lists. Edits appear immediately and moderators review them afterwards. New models go through Suggest a Babe, with a response within seven days.

Rankings use weighted votes. The porn star ranking includes 17,828 names, with niche versions for categories including mature models and OnlyFans creators. You can browse these without having a performer in mind.

Nude and glamour galleries

Babepedia rejects retouched and AI-generated photos, covers and images of explicit sex. Four new galleries arrive each day. Members discuss reported material and decide whether to keep or remove it.

Babepedia porn star ranking
Babepedia

A model profile on Babepedia

Profiles open with visitor ratings, ranking and favourites, followed by aliases, years active, occupations, measurements and scene types. Height and weight use two systems of units, with bra size conversions too.

You then reach social accounts, awards, a biography where available, galleries and comments. Contribution buttons below the profile are there for changing text, uploading photos, adding links and reporting problems.

Babepedia model profile with her biography and measurements
Babepedia

Free, paid for by ads

Advertising pays for free reading on Babepedia, with no reader subscription. Models can buy profile promotion, with arrangements negotiated by email. Partner links also include AI undressing tools.

Stock, images and remedies in three free databases
BabepediaIAFDBoobpedia
Stock177,102 profiles230,160 performers, 862,387 titles46,528 women
ImagesNude and glamour galleriesPortraits onlyOne fair use photo in a short article
RemediesDeletion on proof, 1 to 7 daysSubmit Corrections buttonWrite to an administrator
PriceFreeFree, no accountFree

Locking or removing a profile

Models can request a profile lock, photo changes or deletion with proof of identity. Email handles locks and urgent changes, while removal requests go through the I'm a Model contact form. Deletion is processed within one to seven days.

Accepted proof includes a screenshot of a verified social account's administration area or a photo holding a sheet dated or marked Babepedia.

Strengths and weaknesses

Strengths

  • Photo galleries for exploring profiles visually.
  • Favourites lists and niche rankings.
  • Statistics showing profile field coverage.
  • Profile locking and removal requests for models.

Weaknesses

  • Many profiles have no written biography.
  • Edits are visible before moderation.

The best alternatives to Babepedia

IAFD

IAFD

A free film database for tracing screen credits, finding scene partners and filling gaps in a collection.

  • Tool
  • Free
  • Community
EGAFD

EGAFD

Stage names and reissue titles from European adult cinema to help you identify older films and their performers.

  • Tool
  • Free
  • Community
Boobpedia

Boobpedia

A wiki about busty women, with career articles, references and suggestions for similar models.

  • Tool
  • Free
  • Community

Verdict

Who it suits

  • Discovering models through photos
  • Finding an actress's social accounts
  • Building a favourites list

Who should skip it

  • Finding detailed biographies on every profile
  • Browsing explicit sex galleries

A niche ranking gives you a useful starting point on Babepedia when you want to find new models. From there, you can explore galleries and social accounts, then save appealing profiles with a free account. IAFD is a useful next stop for tracing the film credits of an actress you discover here.

Browsing galleries and niche rankings is Babepedia's strength, and it gets four out of five. Models also have ways to manage their own entries, although most profiles still lack a written biography.